The thing about his "favorite" Patricia "Puke" is that her work features demons as well as the implication of pedophilia. So it's a step worse than all the other art he likes. It combines the evil/satanic + the human pedo evil.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I guess it's a matter of opinion. In Piccinini's work the pedophilia is implicit as for Noble's art it's explicit. Google ''Kim Noble art'' images and see the results, it's right in our face. I don't even want to describe what we see, let alone post it here.
Kim Noble's art was the first I ever looked at. Then the Serbian artist's. I saw almost everything Noble produced. It's evil.
Noble's is explicit pedophelia + Sadomasochism.
Piccinini's is implicit pedophilia + Demons (satanism)