So it only matters that they believe in it, so let's repeat it again, it doesn't matter what you or I believe about it, or of it, it has no bearing on it, then why bring it up? To say that because of their belief they are having super human experiences? And I choose to refuse to believe that they believe that? What gave you that notion? Because I hadn't used the word worship, satan, ritual, and the implications of those concepts?
There's nothing specific in your points, let me reiterate the discussion:
Your Opinion:These superhumanly evil people, are mean and they hurt your mind space and soul.
They are not superhumanly evil people, they are people who do evil things and quantifying or qualifying the evil won't dispel evil, making them otherworldly and contrasting them with a myth or being able to quantify their evil will not bring understanding, justice, won't make conversation more interesting or novel, hell, understanding that evil is banal should be about all the understanding one needs, evil is systemic and thrives in secrecy, in these circles evil is norm, as you know, so let's say that it's a "superhumanly evil" thing and they in turn are superhumanly evil, they are so much more evil and doesn't make a difference either way. If you don't believe in them or if you do they will continue to pursue their goals.
So the discussion, has once again been cornered.
Pointing out that sharing my opinion is "not inviting conversation" or not inviting you to share your opinion?
Exactly, but you didn't even point out your opinion, you validated it into an experience, how can I say anything about your thoughts and your experience when you're making statements like "for me it always comes down to a myth being my compass for superhumanly good". Yes, get mad at me making a valid point, your experience and thoughts are of a myth. So what, the matter isn't about Jebus or whatever deity or myth you follow, it's not about their worship or how valid it is, it's not about their experiences or how "super" they are, and I never invited opinion, has never been a discussion about belief. I will point out that your remark about what it boils down to, isn't going to make discussion, fuck, how did you envision someone taking a remark like "I don't know about you but I believe in JC as ultimate super great"? A: I too believe in that. B: I don't know what to believe. C: I think it comes down to the golden rule. D: It wasn't a question of belief, ever, it was always about recognizing that superhumanly evil, that demonizing people, regardless of their actions will not bring understanding or value to the situation. And then what was your point? To Meet up with A and do bible study? To discuss jesus to b? To agree with C and echo the sentiments therein? Or to laugh at that audacity, of calling your sentiment a myth, and call my arguments into ridicule because gosh darn logic, gosh darn do I even have anything to live for. Weren't you the one giving out free advice to everyone in the form of memes from the last 25 years of self help garbage? I clearly remember reading your "purpose" or "a purpose" as, yeah, clearly you have it figured out if you freely give unwarranted advice.
How about you point out exactly what you're laughing at, or exactly what my opinions are which erupted your hemorrhoids.