Is it simple cognitive dissonance which seems to block many folks from being able to look into this matter for themselves? The subject may be uncomfortable, and perhaps it initially seems so outright outlandish it gets dismissed out of hand, but akin to a lobster shedding its shell, discomfort is often the catalyst for change.
It seems telling that now in the 2nd week of December 2016, that the "official 'fake' news" narrative, seems to have morphed from the odd clues found in the Pedosta[sic] emails, to this new strawman "Hillary Clinton alleged to run child sex ring from DC pizzashop" - classic distraction / muddying the waters tactic. No such serious allegation has been made, by any credible investigator. The Hillary strawman argument has only been made by the (legacy) media - or by those who have refused to do even any basic investigation into the matter - in a blatant attempt to deflect and disinform. Not once do any of these deflection pieces ever look into Majestic Ape / Alefantis, nor the long list of pedo-sadistic imagery these folks seem to enjoy, the posts by Alefantis himself, nor the questionable artwork of the shows held at comet, nor the curious real estate dealing on that block, nor any number of other leads.
To those skeptics resisting looking into this topic: ask yourself, who remains friends and close with convicted pedos? Bill Clinton was shown to have flown on the 'Lolita Express' private jet to convicted pedo Jeffery Epstein's private Little Saint James island, in the US Virgin Islands over 20 times.