Creative Commons: If you are posting content under a Creative Commons license, please attribute and link according to the specific license. If you are posting content under CC0 or Public Domain please consider noting that at the end of your post.
Not indicating that the content you copy/paste is not your original work could be seen as plagiarism.
If you are actually the original author, please do reply to let us know!
While he could technically be the legitimate owner of the image, this surely seems fishy. Thanks - Guess I should do a quick imagesearch before upvoting from now on ...
I'd give him a .000001% chance of being the actual photographer ;) Looking at post history is a very good indicator. 2nd is if an image is plastered across the net, and the guy isn't a professional photog like we have with scotphoto (forgetting his exact handle, the real photog from Tahoe, and others) :)
Source: https://pic2.me/wallpaper/209546.html
Not citing the source of photos (images) is plagiarism. Here is a post on why this is bad, and here is how easy it is to find allowed photos.
Creative Commons: If you are posting content under a Creative Commons license, please attribute and link according to the specific license. If you are posting content under CC0 or Public Domain please consider noting that at the end of your post.
Not indicating that the content you copy/paste is not your original work could be seen as plagiarism.
If you are actually the original author, please do reply to let us know!
This is stunning! Any chance for a higher res version? :)
Take your pic: https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=rice+fields+of+thailand&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJ7zPnrBXJnJ4aiwELEKjU2AQaBAgVCAEMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEiiCC-oV7xWIHo0LmQTpFZIL-BWUHskisSqwKucooyqkN-Y-qSurK6EqGjCwPgR020wvhVMJNDGDV5gNwMqNWartzd5TYgJKL5V31Bl0d_1yoH5OcXvGc7JBLkUwgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBOsjGZ4M&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj0kv7Yy7jZAhWjxFQKHd26A6wQ2A4IJygB&biw=1802&bih=925
While he could technically be the legitimate owner of the image, this surely seems fishy. Thanks - Guess I should do a quick imagesearch before upvoting from now on ...
I'd give him a .000001% chance of being the actual photographer ;) Looking at post history is a very good indicator. 2nd is if an image is plastered across the net, and the guy isn't a professional photog like we have with scotphoto (forgetting his exact handle, the real photog from Tahoe, and others) :)
You're probably right. The particular image seems to be curtesy of that guy here: https://500px.com/photo/82693769/chiang-mai-rice-field-by-sarawut-intarob?ctx_page=4&from=user&user_id=519613
Dude! Amazing photography skills. :))
Thanks....
This was stolen from the web: https://www.google.com/search?safe=off&q=rice+fields+of+thailand&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlwEJ7zPnrBXJnJ4aiwELEKjU2AQaBAgVCAEMCxCwjKcIGmIKYAgDEiiCC-oV7xWIHo0LmQTpFZIL-BWUHskisSqwKucooyqkN-Y-qSurK6EqGjCwPgR020wvhVMJNDGDV5gNwMqNWartzd5TYgJKL5V31Bl0d_1yoH5OcXvGc7JBLkUwgBAwLEI6u_1ggaCgoICAESBOsjGZ4M&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj0kv7Yy7jZAhWjxFQKHd26A6wQ2A4IJygB&biw=1802&bih=925