Do you understand what Monopolizing ideas means? It's the definition of copyright, it's how copyright functions more precisely. So when you judge something dumb without even understanding the basic function of copyrights in clear terms:
Art is monopolized, the act of Permitting only some people or only some uses of ideas is monopolization itself, it's the very act itself that you deny is not happening.
It's as valid as any other errenous opinion or belief.
If you create art that depicts an eagle with the head of an elephant, copyrighting means that anyone who make something that can be considered COPYING the idea, be it in the same medium or an entirely different one all together, you can attempt to subjugate their real property rights.
A rant btw is your logical inconsistent judgmeent of what you think I am doing, which is not "crying" anymore than it is "ranting", but making Salient points and speaking in a logical consistency with clarity and specificity and to avail understanding, there was nothing that could be construed as emotional response or incitement in my arguments.
Sir, are you on drugs or are you this when sober? You are ranting nothing related to the point. You are making no point.
This might seem like I'm "logically inconsistent" but it's difficult to seem logically consistent when you are logically inconsistent. You might think there is a logic, but it sure is special. If it's there.
You are. I have not been talking about monopolizing ideas, but you are claiming I have done.
We can discuss how you will hand over your password to me later on.