You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is Everything Blindly About Balance?

in #philosophy7 years ago

Ooh controversy! :)
Balance, to me, is accurately defined as 'no part or aspect is overpowering any other part or aspect'.
Judgements are thoughtforms that rigidly define that 'x is y' - or 'dogs are scary'. The problem with judgements is that the are outside of time and are essentially guesses which often take on the appearance of fact. There's nothing wrong with simply accepting that we don't know and then remaining open to learning more.

The vague denials you are pointing to are very common in society on Earth, yes - not just among 'spiritual people' but among 'scientists' and many types of people - it's just that the form the denial has taken often has us denying it's presence.

Enlightenment is 'understanding', so inherently it comes with truth - the two go 'hand in hand'. But clearly too we can hold misunderstanding and judge that it is actually correct understanding.

Having deliberately aimed to not judge at all, I have found this approach to not only be helpful but actually to be necessary when problem solving, including when writing computer code. Why do I need to waste my energy in guessing? I don't usually.

This is the delusion of balance being able to answer everything as some convenient solution to not bother having to really think deeper and understand if something is right or not. Just say it's all about balance, you gotta balance everything, etc.

Ironically, the delusional version of balance you are pointing to is actually based on judgements, such as the judgement that "deep thinking isn't necessary if we just have balance".

Denial is at the core of all dysfunction and we probably all have some of that going on - the key is to intend to identify our denials and heal/balance/evolve to clear them and align more completely with actual truth.

Sort:  

Judgment is synonymous with evaluation, diagnosis, discernment. You judge every single day of your life. Everyone does. This is another thing that gets misrepresented ;)

Actually, it is possible to carefully pick through and understand all thoughtforms being held, removing/clearing/releasing all judgements. I have consciously and knowingly released 1000s over the last 15 years since I started. Releasing judgements frees up energy and creates space for change. The example of scary dogs is a clear one. The judgement is that 'Dogs are scary' when in fact the truth is that 'i once felt fear when a dog jumped at me' - you can see how the two thought structures could be judged to mean the same thing, but in fact they do not. the judgement 'dogs are scary' takes an experience and packages it into a blanket statement which applies to every other dog and possible interaction with dogs - which is a misrepresentation of the truth since many interactions with dogs do not involve fear. If i hold the idea that 'dogs are scary' then I may create false feelings of fear when around dogs that makes me edgy and nervous in their presence. By releasing the judgement through identifying the denial that the judgement introduces, I can then experience reality as it is, rather than as I project it to be erroneously.

Judging that 'everyone judges every day' is a sure way to miss the details here - neither of us has met all of the billions of people or knows what they think and do every day. ;)

From a good book on this subject:

Judgments do not open space for improvement because they substitute criticism and the rigidity of labels for good advice and discernment.

Judgment is not the same thing as discernment. Discernment can
draw on past experience, but it also notices the differences.

Past experiences are a source of wisdom, but judgments give false wisdom
because they do not see the situation for what it really is. Judgments also
say that the next experience will be the same as the last experience. This
is the same as saying that nothing has been learned, and also that there is
nothing to learn that could change things for the better.
Judgments are rigid thought forms attached to the thinker. If you judge your experiences rather than understanding and accepting them, you lock the energy into rigid patterns of perception that take your focus away from what could help you grow. Each time the judgment is made again, and the emotions around it remain unmoved, or intensify, the thought form intensifies. For example, 'Tm not a nice person," is a judgment and a label in place of compassion and introspection that could realize why you could have this judgment against yourself.

Intense judgments are usually made amidst a wave of strong emotion when a person's usual sense of things is overwhelmed, and there is a feeling of needing to push back, "make sense of the situation," or define it. While judgments do label and structure the situation, and therefore, can give a person a sense of making sense of things, they are also limiting. In this way, feelings of not having enough understanding, or personal power, are compensated for by imposing misunderstandings and judgments that bring an illusion of understanding, power and control.

Judgments are not necessary steps on the way to understanding. Judgments obscure the ability to use discernment. Discernment in observation and evaluation, learning and experiencing can all take place without judgment. Judgments simplify and rigidify. Judgments are outside of time. They exist after the experience in which they were made, and when the judgments remain, they have the power to influence future experiences to conform to the judgments. This limits your possibilities.

Putting something in a dictionary does not make it the most accurate understanding regarding the concept being defined.

Indeed, so it's not really the concept of balance which is at fault. Balance in one sense is universal fact, that is equilibrium. All systems "balance" towards it.