Yes I would be one of those; I don't believe nukes/atomic bombs are real. There's actually plenty and good enough reasons for this.

First off, it's fear porn. Nothing like culling the ignorant through threats of nuclear warfare, breeding literature and other propaganda to fulfill the fear based fantasies of nuclear fallout's and inhospitable radiation blasted environments to solidify the "realness" of the fictional concept through peoples imagination.

There is one thing that people must know, that is "ATOMISM" is a hoax. and a covert Solar "worshiping" religion built on pseudo-science to earn belief in complete metaphor of the "secret doctrines".

Atom as anyone knows comes from "Akhenaten" shortened to Aten and also spelled Atum/Atom, which represents the sun disk aspect of Ra/Re- who was the known Egyptian Pharaoh that abolished all other Egyptian deities in favor of the Sun as a figure for the archetypal father and creator which went on for 20 years.

There are no such thing as tiny little particles called neutrons, electrons, protons, and neither are there atoms. Of course there is a lot of fallacy built around this to make people believe they can be observed or detected, but it's really just trickery done through exploiting electricity/waves/electromagnetism. Fake experiments like the double-slit were created to muddy the waters on this and thus was born the narrative of the wave-particle duality which also propagates the buyer to believe in the claim that reality is an illusion.

It's true and obvious as pointed out in the videos that the nuclear explosions are all faked and this is why there's pictures of the sun clipped into them (for the reasons stated before). You can think of it as a bastardization of "Fearing God" who they revere as the sun, which they are doing through literal means of creating the belief in the power of an explosion (representative of the power of "god"), if you were to read between the lines.

Anyone who knows Einstein well, knows he was a big fraud along with many others who collaborated in contributing to the pseudo-scientific models that of course, want people to believe in atomism and all the science that supports their "discoveries" and claims that all exist in the quantum quackery world of ones own imagination on chalkboard physics, unlike the real science that was kicked out after the "atoms" discovery.

...Now unfortunately there used to be a great article with compiled sources and explanations on the fallacy of the atomic bomb but it's been deleted. Conclusion, it was actually carpet bombed by fire bombs, and I have heard there was witnesses to saying there were many planes but none of them were interviewed by the media so they could cover it up.

"In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima’s clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the “bald spot” where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn’t there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs – the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava – just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima’s ten-story press building, about three blocks from the center of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects."

Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who 1945 inspected the bombed towns of Japan