You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Flat Earth, Hollow Earth, Minecraft Oh My.

in #philosophy7 years ago (edited)

So I double read part one and I got to say.....

not one single piece of evidence and a bunch of claims about stuff the person obviously has no information on, and a lot of the Nazi story again.

alot of the comments he makes are not only fo far from reality that its funny some of them are just mindboggling the stretch on them. Like saying "the Russians were light years ahead of usa in the space race".

And the whole ordeal of operation paperclip is a huge part of the answer on how.

its alot of Nazis this and Nazis that with no actual facts. the whole thing is just a dude asking questions that have answers but instead of looking into the answer he usus his lack of an answer for the question he asks as reasoning for why something could not have happened.

Like the idea that if we aren't going to the moon right now then that is proof that it never happened in the past or stupid shit like that.

Im sorry but I will not read the second part or more. its just so proudly ignorant of the stuff he is talking about it amazes me. he even quotes hitler then says well I don't know german so that might not be really what he said then goes on for a full paragraph saying hitler ment and said this and that. he just said he had no clue if hitler really said it but now hers using that as one of the main points of his argument?

IDK yo, every question he trys to make as how to prove the moon landing didn't happen a simple google search can find the answers. with that said I would like to repete.

He does not provide any facts or evidence to back up his claims. he only presents questions that he cant answer even though their I a answer to them and because he cant answer them reverts back to the well that's proof it never happened.

Just my opinion though.

What you think about the math and science about the radiation of the Apollo missions and all the calculations that dude did?

Sort:  

Although I disagree with you I think that is a kick arse reply.

You are a complete prick online though so it's no wonder a bunch of people want to kill you

:D
yeah I can be a prick.
lol
I dont even realize im doing it half the time.
:D

Yeah, part 1 is just the opening. The rest of the "book" is all the evidence. If anything, I can tell you it's a good read. Unlike the math jargon you sent me, lol. Even if I had the capacity to try and understand it, I would fall asleep doing it. I would love to find out how this guy found the exact trajectory the Apollo missions follow since all of that information has been "lost". I will do my best to get through it.

well the first problem is you are stating facts about it but also saying you cant understand it. I actually enjoyed reading the facts whre the "book" just had me pulling up pages after pages of facts proving the claims wrong. the main thing I took from the intro is he believes the absence of evidence is the evidence of absence when it doesn't work that way.
Also he explains how he calculated the trajectory and that he only had one flightpath to go off of but all the other Apollo missions followed the same flight path out of the low orbit of earth.

The reason for all the math gargon its so people can redo the math if they aren't sure his calculations were correct like he shows the link to the first person that claims they did the math messed up. Basically that link is to a correction of another person claiming they did the math showing results that were false. he is proving them wrong with mathematical evidence where the other person just made a bunch of claims spouted out a bunch of numbers and when people asked to see the math behind it he had to admit it was a lie.

Basically it proves mathematically that the amount of radiation you get hit with is not enough to be a problem in such short durations. If it was a problem people couldnt spend 100+ days on the space station and stuff.

skip the math, he basically explains everything in the paragraphs before and after he shows you the calculations. unless your wanting to double check his work.
:D

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=16&ved=0ahUKEwj9-tTOlODWAhUC7mMKHT6_CRAQFgh0MA8&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hq.nasa.gov%2Falsj%2Fa11%2Fa11fltpln_final_reformat.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2alRLBd3_ZMJ0WV4lIAa2i

that link is to the original photocopies of the Apollo 11 flight plan in pdf form. the information has not been lost.

That's the thing. You can't prove something didn't happen. I was barely born when most of this stuff was supposedly going on. Would sure like to see a high definition picture of the landing area from a private source. Have you seen one of those laying around?

I will be willing to revisit this once we, with all our great technology, make a return trip. Doubt we ever see it.

Loading...

https://steemit.com/steemit/@skeptic/wtf-steemit

Ill make another reply later, steemit is fucking with me right now.