No, not everything, at least not when you look from our perspective. Take a large step back, look at thousands or millions of years and it'd be easy to notice how nature seeks equlibrium. It's just a higher level of abstraction.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
And that's what the whole morality is, just as subjective. Doing good for one is causing pain in another. Saving human lives good? Well, not if you ask some species which got distinct because of human domination.
You value human life above all other species because your point of view is not objective. You're looking from your subjective perspective to create a moral code deciding what's good or what's bad.