Introduction
As explained in the introduction post my motivation for writing is that this particular book has been unfairly maligned as a proto-communist call for an absolute state. To the contrary though it shares many of the same criticisms of unrestrained democracy as the classical-liberal/libertarian tradition. I can only assume that many who have invoked it be they socialist or individualist have grabbed onto terms such as "general will" without reading Rousseau's own definitions of these. I will be pointing out this books own shortcomings in future posts but there is much here that greatly clarifies the problems Libertarian thought grapples with.
Summary
Preface
- Raises question of if there is a good form of government at all
- Clarifies that by good he means not compromising deontological justice or utilitarian goals
- His right to vote implies an obligation to be informed on politics
Chapter 1
- "Man was born free, and he is everywhere in chains"
- "Those who think themselves the masters of others are indeed greater slaves than they"
- How this came to be is a mystery
- If only considering force citizens should rebel if strong enough or submit without complaint
- However we tend to think in terms of rights derived from the structure of society
- Different societies are built of different agreements rather than a single template from nature
- Therefore a persons exact rights differ from one society to another
- Exactly what the agreements (and by extension rights) are is not obvious
- All of the above will need great clarification before proceeding
Chapter 2
- The oldest and only truly natural society is the family
- ...which dissolves on the children reaching maturity
- Continuing friendship with parents / siblings as adults is a choice outside of nature
- Adults are responsible for their own well being
- Individuals are the best judges of how to carry out this responsibility
- Therefore needing freedom to carry out their duty
- Traditionally states have been modelled on families with the king as father and citizens as children
- Such a state should be built on citizens following the king voluntarily like a family of adult sons still following their father
- However a father's reward is love whereas the king's reward is the pleasure of control
- Grotius argued that slavery proves that at least some states are not benevolent
- Further he compared humanity to herds of cattle owned and eaten by farmers
- Aristotle claimed that some men are born to be masters and others born to be slaves
- But he confused effect and cause. People raised as slaves do not know how to be anything else
- This is a "natural" result of violating natural law
- Rousseau jokes that being descended from Adam and Eve he is a prince and inline to being king of Earth
- Returning to seriousness he explains that hermits are monarchs by default
- This is the only time a "ruler" has no reason to fear rebellion or war
Congratulations @ryanmccoskrie! You received a personal award!
Click here to view your Board
Congratulations @ryanmccoskrie! You received a personal award!
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!