You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What is a logiczombie?

in #philosophy • 5 years ago

I think a logiczombie could be someone that uses your own hypotheticals or logic against you as though it was the only fact, like these people who do shit like but you said [insert some random crap comment you made 10 years ago] then they start hashtags about trash. Basically it is where rejected or hypothetical logic goes to die and be used against you or to fuel their monstrosity of some shit hashtag #logicalmindsmatter !tipuvote 1

5 years ago in #philosophy by
$0.00
    3 votes
    Reply 2
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago (edited) 

    yes!
    great said, I sadly have to deal with a few of them.. ^^

    mostly this [insert some crap comment..] is more like a [their interpretation of what I've said, which fits their flawed logic]
    basically:
    you said [their interpretation of what I've said, which fits their flawed logic] and then

    • either base their argumentation on this misunderstanding but don't accept that they've misunderstood me
    • or continue shooting hard with a shitton of other misunderstandings (which would probably be ur hashtags)

    I also don't wanna discuss about what I've said and/ or truly ment. They should believe me. They have to. They can't know what I think and really mean..
    But they're either not open or think it's about winning the discussion and "being right" and think they truly understand what I mean and I'm just trying to play a game (by telling em they've misunderstood me)..

    thanks for the tip :)

    [-]
     5 years ago (edited) 

    you said [their interpretation of what I've said, which fits their flawed logic] and then

    This is called a "straw-man".

    • either base their argumentation on this misunderstanding but don't accept that they've misunderstood me

    • or continue shooting hard with a shitton of other misunderstandings (which would probably be ur hashtags)

    I also don't wanna discuss about what I've said and/ or truly ment.

    I've seen this too, I call it the "words are written in stone" fallacy.

    They should believe me. They have to. They can't know what I think and really mean..

    This is the "dime-store-psychoanalysis" fallacy.

    But they're either not open or think it's about winning the discussion and "being right" and think they truly understand what I mean and I'm just trying to play a game (by telling em they've misunderstood me)..

    Check this out, it (rule 3 alone) sort of solves all of these problems in one go,

    $0.00
      Reply