I am glad to hear that you enjoyed reading through this post @jrhhewett. :c)

I quite agree. Even the best-intentioned of individuals can be rendered susceptible to emotional compromise when matters hit very close to home. I also like your reference to "other peoples' emotions" - as yes, outrage (real or contrived) can be infectious.

It is my view that persons should not be punished for expressing their views - even if elements of those views might immediately seem reprehensible or otherwise disturbing. At the very least there is value in such views now residing 'above the table'. Such views can be addressed - their logic or lack thereof can be picked apart - and superior views can be posed against them.

I would even suggest that flipping on issues, whether one be a politician or not, need not be considered a negative thing provided that there is a clear crumb trail that can be followed to outline the evolution of perspective (beyond populist motives).

Such provides hope for a cleaner kind of politics - like opening the windows in a house to let the stagnant air flow. :c)

Thank you again for your very thoughtful comment!