Philosophical arguments do not need references.
Philosophical arguments are not opinions, they are logical deductions.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Philosophical arguments do not need references.
Philosophical arguments are not opinions, they are logical deductions.
There is nothing logical in your deductions, there is a lot of logical fallacies.
Here I'll let you figure out the ones.
Anyway I'm done.
It would really help if you were more specific with your criticisms and if you gave some examples.
Specifically which logical fallacy has been made?
Exactly throwing out vague accusations is useless. The criticism needs to be more specific.