You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: What is a logiczombie?

in #philosophy5 years ago (edited)

yes!
great said, I sadly have to deal with a few of them.. ^^

mostly this [insert some crap comment..] is more like a [their interpretation of what I've said, which fits their flawed logic]
basically:
you said [their interpretation of what I've said, which fits their flawed logic] and then

  • either base their argumentation on this misunderstanding but don't accept that they've misunderstood me
  • or continue shooting hard with a shitton of other misunderstandings (which would probably be ur hashtags)

I also don't wanna discuss about what I've said and/ or truly ment. They should believe me. They have to. They can't know what I think and really mean..
But they're either not open or think it's about winning the discussion and "being right" and think they truly understand what I mean and I'm just trying to play a game (by telling em they've misunderstood me)..

thanks for the tip :)

Sort:  

you said [their interpretation of what I've said, which fits their flawed logic] and then

This is called a "straw-man".

  • either base their argumentation on this misunderstanding but don't accept that they've misunderstood me

  • or continue shooting hard with a shitton of other misunderstandings (which would probably be ur hashtags)

I also don't wanna discuss about what I've said and/ or truly ment.

I've seen this too, I call it the "words are written in stone" fallacy.

They should believe me. They have to. They can't know what I think and really mean..

This is the "dime-store-psychoanalysis" fallacy.

But they're either not open or think it's about winning the discussion and "being right" and think they truly understand what I mean and I'm just trying to play a game (by telling em they've misunderstood me)..

Check this out, it (rule 3 alone) sort of solves all of these problems in one go,