You could address the fatal flaw in your argument I pointed out in another comment.

Or, you could address the fact that almost everyone here disagrees with you:

"I'm not sure this article even understands the concept of free will. "
"wrong"
"Free will isn't a mood"
"On the level of consciousness there is however free will. I "can choose" "

@maxnachamkin knows the type of anti-rationalism you are promoting:

"The "there is no free will" paradigm is used to shirk responsibility for how someone's actions are affecting one's life and the lives around them."