Does this video mention anything about the electro or the magentic properties of DNA? Probably not. They, scientists/doctors haven't even begun working with designer magnetics yet. (to heal cells and the body)
Quantumly speaking, how many DNA is in the human body?
There is only 1 DNA in several billion positions.
I can't really give you sources that are at the bottom of the rabbit hole. I can sorta guide you to the rabbit hole, but the journey is yours to take.
Have you read any of the "Cancer cure" books of late? Like, Everything Is Energy?
And? What is wrong with the image above? Scientists already know that DNA is a loop, so why do they show it cut off?
Why do they show it like building blocks? I guess you could see it as building blocks, if you think of words as building blocks of a book, however, the order and meaning are very important.
Have you read this book yet?
https://www.amazon.com/Holographic-Universe-Revolutionary-Theory-Reality/dp/0062014102/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482338304&sr=1-1&keywords=holographic+universe
There are many aspects of what we call reality which we don't yet understand including magnetic and gravitational forces, light waves/photons, and such, but I think it's also important to keep ourselves from making categorical errors. If we're talking about oceans or lakes, we're in a different category than individual water molecules or the atoms which make them up or even the quarks and leptons which make up those atoms.
What do you mean by "Quantumly speaking"? When you say "There is only 1 DNA in several billion positions" that seems like an over simplification.
No, most "cancer cure" stuff I've seen seems to relate more to pseudoscientific woo than evidence (with a little placebo effect thrown in for flavor). I get that on a certain category everything is energy, but science likes reproducible results. Often people throw around scientific sounding words and "quantum theory" type stuff without providing anything reproducible. It's fun for those who like unprovable conspiracy theories and gnostic beliefs, but from what I've seen, much of it leads no where.
That said, I want to keep an open mind. I have seen some interesting things about using light to mess with individual cells and such. I'm interested in learning more. When you say "Everything is Energy" do you mean the book by Mike MacDonald? Would you recommend that as a starting point for the concepts you're describing?
Yes, most of my knowledge now comes from the area of woo woo.
But I wouldn't call it pseudo-scientific.
Long ago, I worked for the cancer industry. I had access to all of the information. If I told you what I did, you could probably figure out who I am.
At that time, I thought that all those cancer cures were "pseudo-scientific woo".
What I learned was that the cancer industry is about causing and treating cancer, and that a cancer cure is never to be spoken of. The manipulation of data that goes on in their depths, places them firmly outside the area of being honest, and one could say VERY unscientific.
Later I learned about cancer curing places. These places have a high success rate. And their numbers aren't massaged, so it could be said that these places are more scientific.
But, cancer cures has more to do with getting over the emotional blockage. Once that is done, almost anything will cure the cancer.
If you would like to understand this more, a woo book to read is
https://www.amazon.com/Hands-Light-Healing-Through-Energy/dp/0553345397/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482346299&sr=1-1&keywords=hands+of+light
Yes, all the DNA being a single DNA in multiple locations (quantumly speaking) is an oversimplification.
You could very much say that each time a cell divides, it asks the parent DNA structure, same cell or new cell? And thus, the body can change and heal over time.
DNA has 12 layers, and we only discuss one, maybe two.
When DNA researchers start actively talking about the tree of life, then we might actually be looking at real designer children. Until then, we are looking at stabbing at something in the dark and seeing what we get.
The term junk DNA is still thrown around, even though it was shown (by a group of people that study language) to be information. From my views, nature doesn't produce junk, everything had an important purpose, or it just wasn't done. Nothing wasted. Since the term junk DNA is still bandied about, we really do not know much about DNA