In the video, they claimed that it was"fire bombed" like the fire bombing done in Europe for example.
So.. It appears as if they have an argument for that. Doesn't mean they are right about that argument, but they do have an argument. I can't say for sure one way or the other, I wasn't there. But I lean towards the accepted historical narrative right now.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Absolutely, and why wouldn't you. After all historical narratives are always correct.
Oh oops, you're right.. ALL historical narratives are always false.. So I should throw every historical thing out the window without selectively picking and choosing which ones seem more logical to me. Let's just throw it all out and disregard everything that's ever been claimed to have happened!
That's a good starting point.