From a natural approach, any aspect of life, whether biological or social, the fact of NOT DEPENDING on another individual or group of individuals is synonymous with survival, where basically a given species generates favorable conditions to evolve, and be able to adapt to the difficult situations offered by the environment, that is to say, I agree with the proposal to place 50% as a beneficiary to PH, in the search to increase the VP of the community, and with it to reach a solid organic and sustainable independence in time, that will allow us to evolve as a community, because this will bring collective benefits at the moment that HP issues votes of support to the articles of the members of the community.

In relation to the previous methodology, in terms of experience I am one of the newest members of PH, however, when evaluating the percentages of 30, and 50% I found that the difference is relative, since the lowest percentage generates the lowest income and vice versa, therefore, in my opinion if the 50% proposed produces more impulse to vote, and this translates into more income for the user, and simultaneously is supporting the growth in VP of the community, are positive aspects that will benefit us all in the near future.

Now, I think it is convenient to incorporate other thematic areas related to science, such as biology, engineering, agronomy, chemistry, among others, in order to attract more users who wish to join PH. I will take advantage of these lines, to reiterate my gratefulness to @crypto.piotr and @project.hope, by the receptivity and support that have given to the content that I have shared with the community, since basically I have had to write approaches of the Botanical world to the thematic ones of HP.

You can count on my support, as of my next publication I will start assigning 50%, regardless of whether this is the methodology we adopt collectively.