Hello @coach.piotr
We have already talked about it privately, for my part you know that I agree with the 50/50, considering the end that is being pursued, I feel that it is a way of self-sustaining the project. In the end, although it is true that 50% is a lot, what I see is that with the vote of @ph-fund with a greater power it will be able to serve to compensate what it stops earning by placing a higher percentage.
Then, placing 50% would be earning almost the same in terms of economic benefit, but with the additional benefit of achieving self-sustainability, which is something every project should seek. Of course, any extra support will always be welcome, but let it not be that extra support that keeps the project solely and exclusively.
If a community leader is willing to make certain sacrifices, then I don't see why I shouldn't do it.