First that is a complex/loaded question which argues that I did insinuate something about kid's intelligence, and as usual per the complex question fallacy it begs for either a yes or a no, but without questioning the premise of the question we cannot find out anything meaningful. Why do you think I have insinuated anything about kid's intelligence with my statement of fact: That there is nothing financial system that fills our lives 24/7, or our kids, unless you and your kids are watching nothing but the stockmarket. ??

I simply stated the facts, I didn't imply an opinion of how intelligent kids are. Next time you might want to reread your questions though, and ask yourself if it's even valid first, or worth looking like a fool over.