Someday. Maybe far off in the future, when we've learned that democracy is only as good as the voters' sources of information. If those sources are controlled (via medical tyranny for one, which is nicely positioned, right now, to murder billions with a simple, government mandated, medical procedure), then demoncracy is more like it. Or maybe it will all collapse and we will build what we want to see, instead of accepting what we are shown. One way is slower than the other. Is one of them better than the other? Perhaps governments using open source would make more honest beings of the humans that power them.