There is no such thing as good or bad content. There is auto-voters and how many people you can get to put you on their vote trail. You are one of the few big accounts that aren't on "set it and forget it" curation aren't you?
If only manual curation was a thing again right? haha
The challenge is that manual curation is a complete waste of time. What is the value to the curator? Nothing but time lost and maybe a few cents gained in curation rewards.
It's a losing game.
Also, is it beneficial to pass off the act of curation to investors? They get an investment...and a job?...probably one in which the have no interest at that. It doesn't really make sense when you think about it. I wonder how we could change that?
That's a very good question. Investors and users do not need to be the same and many times probably are not in this case.
50% curation rewards. 50% author rewards.
The people who are self voting are already earning on that model.
We don't want the rich to get richer, so everyone should get poorer?