"Good content" is very subjective. I can like street fighter and watching pro level play. You can like programming and learning what programs can do. But in the long run people can usually agree what is bad content. Whether or be the person making the content or the content itself. Whether it be a scam someone is running or just their general attitude. One of the worst is watching someone that used to have a content quality you like slowly become something you jaye because they just started caring more about money then the content they provided.
But in the long run people can give good content and they will grow. Others will provide content that people will slowly leave because how bad the quality has gotten. You can see that happening from people's post as the amount they make slowly dwindles down. Most times people wake up and just stop supporting the content they no longer like. Or that one post I saw when some big name person tried to invite a steamer that is a scammer now after jabbing a long history of doing good. It's disappointing if they try and bring over people that will be much more toxic to a community then a benefit.
Posted using Partiko Android
Well, that's part of the problem with the system, isn't it?
Sadly enough that is true the system belongs to the ones with the power to control it. Which can be at times a bad thing for steem. At times giving those a platform who should not continue to be able to have one. But the ones with the power to upvote allow to have a form of voice.
Posted using Partiko Android