Once they wash the history of the civil war, because it was "so painful". (Even though no one is alive that even took part in it.) The history of slavery would virtually disappear. How would one explain freedom from something, if there was never anything to end it?
The dems have certainly been living 1984, look at the dull, lulling mass of it's followers. Try explaining to them that the democrats were the ones fighting to keep slaves.
Or showing them that most slaves were bought and sold in Baltimore- Often by freed Black slave owners in Louisiana. Louisiana had the majority of slave owners and slave breeders in the US. The black owned plantations are never mentioned, and they try to make it look as if the white confederates owned most of the slaves, which was false. Many slaves had more land of their own than southern whites did. Both blcks and whites could enter work contracts of "endentured servitude". The first owner of a black slave in the US was- A black slave master- but this is not mentioned. Slavery is still prevalent in Africa and the middle east today, yet the BLM does not condemn it.
You're on top of it. It doesn't serve the party line to tell the whole truth. This racial division would collapse if the truth were to be expressed.
I see a post about black slave owners in my future, when time permits. Probably several posts.