You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvoting due high pending rewards and a lack of engagement?

in #newsteem5 years ago

It's not going under anybody's radar. People just don't want to get on his (s)hit list.

I wish bernie would curate more now that curators get 50%. Thankfully, his content is basically empty now as opposed to maximally repulsive as it has been in the past. Why not use his stake to support something that would help the price get up from its current rut?

Sort:  

yeah, he is a little short in the sanity department, but he's also a little limp these days to be fighting a multiprong battle of downvoters.

I hope the battle will pick up intensity in the near future. Anonymous voting accounts held by thousands of users with all their negative votes reserved for abusive whales and positive votes for curation would be cool. No targets for retaliation. Death by a thousand cuts to early miners who never invested a nickle looking to cash out as rapidly as possible by self-upvoting not only empty but downright repulsive content harmful to the platform to the extent of being newsworthy in the crypto space.