I think a number have done the same to give a bit more flexibility when voting. I'm too lazy and would rather have the option to switch various stakes on and off. At the rate they are being released though, I guess delegating could be the best option.
I prefer on at all times. It's easy, I don't have to think, and for this post here I earned three separate curation rewards. With so many new tokens and groups, tags, whatever... it's better, in my mind, to leave everything staked and in my control. One post I'll get two tokens, the next one I might get three, someday I might get more; I won't need to look at the tags, I can just vote like normal.
I think some will, and that's how I felt to begin with. However, if you have a decent stake in a token and the posts you find via steemit/busy are not using the tag that 'activates' your stake to vote, then you aren't actually using what the stake is there for. Hmm, badly explained.
Basically, I'm topping out my PAL vote power whilst my Steem vote power is clinging on to 80%. And it's very likely my LEO power will be sat at 100% even more than PAL.
It's a faff, but without options to switch off your S V P at each interface (this is available on dtube), it would be shrewd to delegate to accounts and curate 'locally'. Not much better with the explanation but i hope you are with me :)
I totally get it. Right now both my SP and PP are equal in vote power, which makes sense because of variety, and to me it only makes sense the smaller niche groups remain fully powered at almost all times, because I won't spend the day voting only sports or investment advice, nor will I have the time to creep around to each group. I'll be treating the smaller niche as a bonus. Soon enough every post will come with that bonus anyway, so to me it won't really matter what the token's name is or where it comes from. I should admit though, I'm kinda fuzzy in the head today.
Most things I'd downvote would be unacceptable in most communities. The bidbot abuse, well, different story I guess, but if most votes were bought, chances are they're earning PAL from a STEEM vote seller, so that just makes the downvote more powerful, meaningful, and hopefully the abuse stops quicker.
This only adds to the confusion though. I wouldn't want to see a slider with 50 options.
That's the thing. the likes of buildawhale don't have any PAL staked. And so if you disagreed with a reward on Steem and chose to downvote, you would be downvoting the post on palnet with the same % which had received 0 vote value from buildawhale 'over there'. The vote could be used to downvote something else :)
I think a number have done the same to give a bit more flexibility when voting. I'm too lazy and would rather have the option to switch various stakes on and off. At the rate they are being released though, I guess delegating could be the best option.
I prefer on at all times. It's easy, I don't have to think, and for this post here I earned three separate curation rewards. With so many new tokens and groups, tags, whatever... it's better, in my mind, to leave everything staked and in my control. One post I'll get two tokens, the next one I might get three, someday I might get more; I won't need to look at the tags, I can just vote like normal.
I think some will, and that's how I felt to begin with. However, if you have a decent stake in a token and the posts you find via steemit/busy are not using the tag that 'activates' your stake to vote, then you aren't actually using what the stake is there for. Hmm, badly explained.
Basically, I'm topping out my PAL vote power whilst my Steem vote power is clinging on to 80%. And it's very likely my LEO power will be sat at 100% even more than PAL.
It's a faff, but without options to switch off your S V P at each interface (this is available on dtube), it would be shrewd to delegate to accounts and curate 'locally'. Not much better with the explanation but i hope you are with me :)
I totally get it. Right now both my SP and PP are equal in vote power, which makes sense because of variety, and to me it only makes sense the smaller niche groups remain fully powered at almost all times, because I won't spend the day voting only sports or investment advice, nor will I have the time to creep around to each group. I'll be treating the smaller niche as a bonus. Soon enough every post will come with that bonus anyway, so to me it won't really matter what the token's name is or where it comes from. I should admit though, I'm kinda fuzzy in the head today.
The separate account thing for me is mostly for downvoting.
Since they all share the same voting pool, I figured it was easier to maximize. But yeah, I would prefer having one account that does it all.
Most things I'd downvote would be unacceptable in most communities. The bidbot abuse, well, different story I guess, but if most votes were bought, chances are they're earning PAL from a STEEM vote seller, so that just makes the downvote more powerful, meaningful, and hopefully the abuse stops quicker.
This only adds to the confusion though. I wouldn't want to see a slider with 50 options.
That's the thing. the likes of buildawhale don't have any PAL staked. And so if you disagreed with a reward on Steem and chose to downvote, you would be downvoting the post on palnet with the same % which had received 0 vote value from buildawhale 'over there'. The vote could be used to downvote something else :)
Yes, I know it's one big clusterfuck now. LOL!