Border Wall Bids Emerge;

in #newsleaks8 years ago



Include Everything From Tourist Attractions To Nuclear Waste Storage
.............................................................................................................................................

Yesterday was the deadline for companies to submit bids for Trump's "physically imposing" yet "aesthetically pleasing" border wall between the U.S. and Mexico. And while the U.S. government has said they won't disclose bids, rather just the names of companies actually awarded contracts on June 1st, some of the companies decided to disclose their plans themselves. Below are a couple of our faves...

  • Gleason Partners of Las Vegas, for example, revealed its proposal to line the border wall with solar panels so that it could, among other things, sell electricity to Mexico to help pay for the wall. Per the AP:

The panels would provide electricity for lighting, sensors and patrol stations along the wall. Sales of electricity to utilities could cover the cost of construction in 20 years or less, according to the company. Power could also be sold to Mexico.

"I like the wall to be able to pay for itself," said managing partner Thomas Gleason.
Border Wall

  • Another company, Crisis Resolution Security Services, wants to turn the border wall into a massive tourist attraction with beautiful panoramic views of the desert landscapes.

Crisis Resolution Security Services Inc. of Clarence, Illinois, proposes a wall that is 56 feet (17 meters) high and 22 feet (7 meters) wide at the top — with plenty of room to allow tourists to enjoy desert views.

The height — nearly twice what the government envisions — would deter climbers, and its width would give the structure longevity, said chief executive officer Michael Hari.

  • Clayton Industries had the slightly different idea of storing nuclear waste under the wall.

Clayton Industries Inc. of Pittsburgh proposes storing nuclear waste along the wall in trenches that are at least 100 feet (30 meters) deep.

Money already collected by the U.S. Department of Energy from people who benefit from nuclear power would help pay for the wall.

The bid includes an option for hardware to convert the nuclear waste to energy.
Meanwhile, a San Diego company decided to focus on the "aesthetically pleasing" component of the RFP...

  • Concrete Contractors Interstate of San Diego proposed a polished concrete wall augmented with stones and artifacts specific to areas on the 2,000-mile (3,218-kilometer) border.

Russ Baumgartner, CEO of the company, says the wall should be "a piece of art."

Customs and Border Protection's solicitation says the wall should be "aesthetically pleasing" from the U.S. side. Baumgartner wants to decorate both sides.

Sort:  

Serious question - can someone who thinks this wall is a good idea provide a reasonable reason why?

It's 2017. Ladders are a thing, even tall ones. Balloons. Tunnels. Ropes. Ultralight aircraft. Blimps. Parachutes. And at each end, there's a big body of water.

ask a person who lives near the border that question.

I live around 150 miles closer to the border than you do.

I don't know anyone who feels the way it would appear you do, including my friends in Austin. Want to try to explain it to me?

Seriously, instead of the hyperbole, I would sincerely appreciate a reasoned response why building a GREAT WALL (our president's words, not mine) is a good idea.

2200 years ago in China, with ground armies running around, I can at least understand the logic.

The wall is intended to deter and discourage anything short of a military incursion. If a military incursion occurs...we have the army.