Yes. Do you think the UK getting 10% of the revenue from companies publishing child pornography will decrease it, or will it create incentives for the UK to increase it?
Thanks!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes. Do you think the UK getting 10% of the revenue from companies publishing child pornography will decrease it, or will it create incentives for the UK to increase it?
Thanks!
I think 10% revenue will increase it
I agree, and I think that's why the UK government proposed that 'solution' that is no solution at all, but a way for government to profit from sexually trafficking the children of their citizens. I think it's a terrible crime, and should not be permitted. Corporations can't be hanged for crimes, but the people claiming to be acting on the behalf of corporations can, and corporations can be stripped of assets that investors fund them with expecting to profit from child sex trafficking, removing the profit motive from such investments, and that money can go not to governments, that might give them a financial incentive to allow more such corporations to be formed by investors, but to the victims, the children trafficked, enabling them to prosper and rise up out of their desperate circumstances. Government agents that encourage such 'solutions' can also be hanged, because they are vile criminals that would profit from harming children whom they are supposed to be defending, and that would serve as a warning to any other madmen that might want to commit such crimes that they will not be tolerated.
I hope very much that is what actually happens.