Agreed. It was a simple ploy of diversion; a case of accusing their opponent of being close to a certain foreign power and benefiting from them. Meanwhile, members of the DNC have actually benefited from the same foreign govt. By the way, let's not talk about all of the other connections that the leaders of the DNC have to other foreign strategic adversaries; somehow Russia jumps to the top of this list.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: