It seems hypocritical for the gatekeepers to tell us for months that even with no evidence, an investigation into Trump and Russia is needed for our collective peace of mind, yet when it comes to the origins of the so called hacked information, there is no call for any investigations. Yet, as you say, the opposite is true. This is definitely very telling. There is a long history of sketchy circumstances and occurrences that happened to those that got too close during their investigations to the Clintons.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The narrative of the Russia hacker story amuses me no end. The accusation is that Russian hackers penetrated the servers of HRC, the DNC, and Podesta.
The hackers released the emails, which revealed the conspiracy to defraud the Democratic party and put forth HRC as the Democratic candidate.
Russia apparently tried to influence the American election for president by telling the truth.
Sacrilege!
Why didn't this story get shut down immediately with the statement "Thank you Russian hackers, for revealing these awful crooks that almost stole the election for President of the USA!"
That's my takeaway from the story. Thank you Seth Rich, or even Russian hackers. Thank God we now know who HRC is.
Agreed. It was a simple ploy of diversion; a case of accusing their opponent of being close to a certain foreign power and benefiting from them. Meanwhile, members of the DNC have actually benefited from the same foreign govt. By the way, let's not talk about all of the other connections that the leaders of the DNC have to other foreign strategic adversaries; somehow Russia jumps to the top of this list.