It's evident you don't like or believe in Technical Analysis as you've written.

What I believe is irrelevant.

You must have failed in the past in having tried it and lost money.

Nope. I don't trifle with bullshit.

Let me tell you, I have 25k followers who disagree with you.

Also irrelevant. Your rewards are primarily coming from the single vote of one account on each post.

They follow for money making analysis and just because YOU don't agree or don't like it gives you no right to stifle what others want.

Flagging doesn't stifle anything. Your followers are still free to read everything you post. Red herring.

I too shall downvote your comments and reverse your downvotes when I disagree and feel you are censoring others as you've had quite often.

You're flagging out of spite, which is in clear violation of the spirit of flagging. Flagging isn't censorship, it doesn't affect the ability of anyone to read what you have to say. It's a way to reduce the rewards on a post if someone disagrees with the amount scheduled to be paid out.

You're trying to conflate 25k followers that buy into your TA nonsense with one voter, @rancho-relaxo, who makes each of your repetitive, pointless posts pay out to the tune of $70,000 USD per month. Your posts aren't worth that much. I will continue to downvote them if they are scheduled for payouts beyond my own, subjective estimation of their worth. This is not censorship, just voting.

This would be an entirely different story if your rewards were coming from thousands of people you'd helped (which would be impossible with TA, as it's not an accurate tool for predicting anything, so that wouldn't actually happen because your however-many-thousand followers aren't consistently making money with your tea leaf readings). But that's not what's happening here; one person is upvoting each and every post you make, pushing their scheduled payouts up to far beyond what those posts are worth.