I must thank you for linking me to this. You have actually reaffirmed my political faith in the platform. This thread shows there are people on both sides of the asile who respect open discourse. And have made similar points to mine about how @davidpakman, in this case at least. Isn't making an argument other than essentially grouping together people who disagree with him politically. Once I have some more time later I hope to engage in some proper political debate with these fine people. Have a good one mate and God bless!
So which point do you disagree with?
I guarantee that any one that you come up with I can provide a video where @davidpakman has already gone into great length on his opinion of the topic.
For example, if you hear that the "Men's Rights" movement is pseudo intellectualism and feel that this is an ad hominem, then I have bad news for you...
In the old world we had 1 person that spoke to the people. That world is quickly fading away. The new world will have deeper longer discussions. Like what you are seeing Joerogan doing with 3 hours argument discussions. This is real discusssion not something that is short.
This video doesn't make an argument. Just as @prlndra is saying. Now multiple people have detected it. This speech in this video is as I said earlier walking all over the place trying to confuse you. You have others in this thread that also has been confused.
I must thank you for linking me to this. You have actually reaffirmed my political faith in the platform. This thread shows there are people on both sides of the asile who respect open discourse. And have made similar points to mine about how @davidpakman, in this case at least. Isn't making an argument other than essentially grouping together people who disagree with him politically. Once I have some more time later I hope to engage in some proper political debate with these fine people. Have a good one mate and God bless!
So which point do you disagree with?
I guarantee that any one that you come up with I can provide a video where @davidpakman has already gone into great length on his opinion of the topic.
For example, if you hear that the "Men's Rights" movement is pseudo intellectualism and feel that this is an ad hominem, then I have bad news for you...
In the old world we had 1 person that spoke to the people. That world is quickly fading away. The new world will have deeper longer discussions. Like what you are seeing Joerogan doing with 3 hours argument discussions. This is real discusssion not something that is short.
@prlndra you're also upvoting a lot of garbage in here. :|
Important note that the video isn't to dismiss whatever bad idea you think was attacked but to wonder why you fell for it in the first place.
This video doesn't make an argument. Just as @prlndra is saying. Now multiple people have detected it. This speech in this video is as I said earlier walking all over the place trying to confuse you. You have others in this thread that also has been confused.
If it confuses you, it's not @davidpakman's fault.
You can clearly see that there are more than me. At the moment in this thread it's 3 vs. you. He is not making any real argument in this video.
Yeah, because 3 people can't be wrong.
You make no arguments either or a real discussion so I will just end it here.