I'm back after a break. I told you what I thought about this for the most part earlier, so I won't bother repeating.
On the topic of it being created to hurt Hillary Clinton, there is a lot she has done indisputably that achieves that result on its own. The day they started the Clinton Foundation it became a slippery slope into the inescapable depth of corruption. I personally don't believe that Hillary is in charge of orchestrating a pedophilia ring. This is because she is busy and does not likely care. I doubt she cares about anything except for fulfilling all the backdoor deals she got herself into. I do know that her husband is into underage teen girls, which is illegal in the US, so in that respect the connection is there.
However, the moment they started that Foundation they became entrenched in corruption well beyond the typical political level, which is astronomical as it is. In all Causes, to get donations you must do favors. No insider deals = no donations. That's how every single Foundation, Charity, or Non-Profit works. I have a strong background in this sector and I can't think of that many that don't. If they're honestly providing a service without these side deals, they fail. No one donates without getting something back.
Foundations are the most at risk of corruption as they handle monetary distributions and are generally proprietary. Even if one was started with a public good premise, it quickly becomes overwhelmed with insider greed and thievery. In the case of the Clintons, it is doubtful that they started it to benefit others; it is just a way to get an extra paycheck and dodge taxes. Still, to fill its coffers one must make a lot of underhanded deals. Start small and escalate. Thievery and greed take over. All groups operate the same way; once you slip there is no climbing back out.
Anyways ... Amongst these favors, backdoor deals and other agreements (many of which were well-documented and investigated way before Hillary ran for the Presidential Office) there are bound to be donations, allotments, fundraisers attended or held, etc to the most unimaginable filth on the planet. The moment anyone and everyone heard that a Foundation has opened its doors -- doesn't even matter which one it is -- they flock to it. You can link anyone with anything. That doesn't mean you disregard it all without due impartial investigation, as I said in my earlier replies.
Here's an example from my own experience. I was looking for somewhere to volunteer and support and mentioned in my classified post that I'd support financially. I got three replies back: one was a small charity which wanted to build a little train for a local farmers market, one was a pyramid scheme (the person who contacted me thought it was a legitimate business), and one was a plan to build a religious school (which turned out to be a front for indoctrinating children to support ISIS). So that's two out of three that were pure dogshit and the scum of humanity.
Anyways, don't want to hijack your post. I have many more to read now that I've returned to Steemit.
In 1995, Cathy O'Brien claimed in her book that Hillary Clinton raped her (as she was a CIA sex slave via the documented MK Ultra project). That same year, Bill Clinton issued a formal apology to victims of human experimentation at the hands of the US government.