Craig Wright had nothing to do with the bitcoin white paper, nor developing bitcoin. This is his last desperate attempt to do.... something. Even Roger has disavowed him. It's really getting old.
Nick & Hal were Satoshi.
https://www.ccn.com/university-claims-law-professor-nick-szabo-created-bitcoin
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think the Nick + Hal story makes the most sense to me, of all the theories out there.
Nick Szabo fails to understand the history of money. He writes giant tomes on it, but does not have understanding that all historical money MUST have an asset that backs it. He fails to understand that Manhattan indian beads were a Proof of Work, as were the specific Californian seashells used as native money. His lack of understanding shows, bc he also doesn't understand Bitcoin. Therefore, he cannot possibly be Satoshi.
Hal Finney was a big part of making the original protocol work, and he deserves some credit. But he wasn't the visionary, that was Craig S Wright.
Read roger's wikipedia page, he has no legs on which to stand either technically or socially.
Wouldn't put much effort into listening to anything he says; even when he's right (correct side of BTC/BCH fork) he's wrong (wrong side of BCH/BSV fork).