I understand that people hold political ideas not because they are evil or want to hurt others intentionally - some maybe do, but most don't, but "problem" with non-libertarians or statists that they mostly don't have any principles to stand on. When libertarians call for ending the war on drugs for example, we do it out of principle, not because we want people do drugs, but because we think that every person owns himself and his body and he is free to do whatever he wants with it (studpid things included), when we call for cutting welfare benefits and lowering taxes we don't do it because we hate the poor, but because we understand that taking other's people hard earned money is wrong, it would be wrong for someone to force people to do stuff for him, so it's wrong for someone to take other people's money by force... Libertarian idea is so simple, yet you can apply it to so many areas.

When you say libertarian ideas are hard to apply to or world, you are contradicting yourself. Why? When you wrote this response to my comment, you supposed - rightfully so - that non-violence is meaningful and that I am a free individual that can be reasoned with. Everything libertarians want to do is expand this principle to everyone including government... make this non-violence universal, and apply it to the government. Does government treat me the same when they take your money? No, the government uses violence.

You can have competence-based hierarchies in a libertarian social order and organize with whoever you want and however you want (but you can't use force), and in reality there is no compromise, it's like saying "we are going to stop rape" but we will choose 100 people who can rape without being punished. Libertarianism is about principles, not "engineering" society.