Ah, and the noble haejin comes along to protest against being downvoted. Shortly afterwards he goes and downvotes all those who've protested against his reward pool rape.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ah, and the noble haejin comes along to protest against being downvoted. Shortly afterwards he goes and downvotes all those who've protested against his reward pool rape.
Downvoted for only onesided post without providing a full, unbiased context. Your comment leads others to misunderstand @haejin's blogs. You also have a history of supporting spams, hate and racist memes towards my blogs.
So we should downvote your posts because they provide a onesided view of a market with biased content, which causes people to misunderstand the financial markets? I think you'd disagree with that.
You, like all trolls, have placed the context elsewhere except into your post; that is where the error lies.
I have downvoted the racist meme makers. I have downvoted the insult ridden posters. I have downvoted the liars. I have downvoted those who relentlessly downvoted the commenters in my blogs, I have downvoted those who have intentionally spammed my blogs, I have downvoted those who adverstise on my blogs, I have downvoted those who censored on my blogs, and I shall continue to do so.
You also have been flagging me, who has done none of those things.
There's actually nothing against complaining about a guy making about $1 million a year by causing others to lose money. You're undeniably censoring posts which disagree with you.