it's true there are lots of examples of people existing peacefully within nations, using democracy by consensus to elect leaders and make laws. They have rules but no rulers. I don't think they consider themselves an individualist or an anarchist.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It does not matter if they consider themselves anarchists or not. The meaning of the word anarchy is 'without rulers. If they don't have rulers, than they are anarchists. We don't consider ourselves slaves but yet we are.