"A truther is basically someone that doesn't believe the generally accepted truth of a certain subject. " I just want the truth. lol

Credibility does not exist as a form we can see at the table. No one has any of it unless they do there own research and testing. lol

Monetization is something all people have to consider for obvious reasons.

Sensationalism is deceit and can usually be shown to arise from monetization.

Religion is a huge category that includes most of the population. The fact is that many so called sciences use Natural Sciences credibility to enhance their own dogmatic beliefs and by doing so are really practicing the new religion called scientism. One way a person can know they are dealing with a religion and not natural science is in how the ology names there unproven ideas. In scientism they come up with names like The Theory of Evolution or The Big Bang Theory, but when you ask for the time machine they must have had to confirm what is claimed to be proven they will role there eyes and walk away.

Believe systems are all stupid as human beings can know things. Just believing is the religious lazy person's method for escaping responsibility for what they manifest into the world. One can think that the world has a creator without being religious. It is one thing to explain the ordered reality we see by thinking it was planned and quite another thing to claim you have special rights and know what that creator wants. The one is looking at evidence and the other is fraud.

Conclusion. No matter how you slice it or dice it what you think is true is entirely different from what you have experienced. I would rather spend my thinking on things that have substance even though I know there is mass and corporal worlds. The two are separate but have places of interaction. It is just easier to think about that you can touch than that you cannot. lol