Everything anyone thinks to be true has either been
told to them by someone
proven by them
imagined by them
Which of those three options is it for you in the case of those conspiracy theories? Because I highly doubt it's 2 and if it's the other options, in the best case scenario, you are calling the cattle black, pot.
First of all, even if a conspiracy theory is true, it still is a conspiracy theory. Just like a scientific theory doesn't stop to be a theory, even if the evidence is so immense, that it's accepted as fact.
Second: It is pretty clear, which conspiracy theories David is talking about, if you actually listen to what he says in the video. I quote: "When there is a mass-shooting, there are these elements from the internet and from the Alex Jones show, that claim, that the events where staged with actors." So a much more clearer definition than what you claim, at least 9/11 can't possibly in any way be 'lumped in' with it.
And third which 9/11 conspiracy exactly do you believe to be fact and where is the evidence for that? It is btw lovely, how you assert you are right about something most people have a different opinion on without providing evidence first.
Everything anyone thinks to be true has either been
Which of those three options is it for you in the case of those conspiracy theories? Because I highly doubt it's 2 and if it's the other options, in the best case scenario, you are calling the cattle black, pot.
[Deleted]
First of all, even if a conspiracy theory is true, it still is a conspiracy theory. Just like a scientific theory doesn't stop to be a theory, even if the evidence is so immense, that it's accepted as fact.
Second: It is pretty clear, which conspiracy theories David is talking about, if you actually listen to what he says in the video. I quote: "When there is a mass-shooting, there are these elements from the internet and from the Alex Jones show, that claim, that the events where staged with actors." So a much more clearer definition than what you claim, at least 9/11 can't possibly in any way be 'lumped in' with it.
And third which 9/11 conspiracy exactly do you believe to be fact and where is the evidence for that? It is btw lovely, how you assert you are right about something most people have a different opinion on without providing evidence first.