You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Restaurant Owner at the Center of Pizzagate, James Alefantis, Answers Questions About Pizzagate Outside Comet Pizza

in #news8 years ago (edited)

I think emails are permissible as evidence in court my friend. ;)

though i believe it is called "digital evidence". As for the rest...i think as you watch this stuff and learn about things like when the clintons went to haiti to get a friend out of trouble for attempting to abduct 33 children...or all trips to pedo island with epstein.

There is too much NOT to want to investigate. I mean lets be rational here--if an investigation takes place and we are proven wrong, everyone will be happy. If we are right, and we dont investigate...what happens?

To me it is about that simple. I wouldn't be saying this if there werent so many damn photos with pedo symbolism (oftentimes multiple in the same photo). but after you see enough of it you just say "ok this is either an elaborate and well thought out false flag, or this is real and sick".

At that point there is only one answer imho. Investigation.

Sort:  

"I think emails are permissible as evidence in court my friend. ;)"

The emails literally say nothing of relevance to the claims though. You need a special 4chan decoder to turn them into something else and that point they are no longer evidence they are a 4chan fabrication. I'm not saying emails aren't a valid form of evidence in general, I'm saying these specific wikileaks emails don't support the claim pizzagaters are alleging.

I think if you slow down and weigh each claim one by one you see a pattern of poor evidence gathering or out right fabrication of evidence. The willingness of proponents for pizzagate to accept anything without question as legitimate evidence wreaks of mental illness.

Just look at the photos in this post being twisted. A little girl and her sister played a game and she had her hands taped. That is a completely sweet and innocent moment. My brother and I used to play a game called "escape" when we were kids. We would take turns tying and sometimes even taping each other to a chair as best we could, then see if the other could pull a Houdini and escape.

Then there is the baby with money in it's mouth. Let's not pretend we all haven't seen photos like the one below and laughed.

I find the pizzagaters that take issue with those instagram photos to be more twisted and suspect than James Alefantis.

"The emails literally say nothing of relevance to the claims though. You need a special 4chan decoder to turn them into something else and that point they are no longer evidence they are a 4chan fabrication."

"I'm saying these specific wikileaks emails don't support the claim pizzagaters are alleging."

And what I am asking you is: Why then do the FBI and other law agencies use compile lists of commonly used terms for various criminal industries around the world? The answer is that they put them together to help you decode emails that otherwise seem ridiculous without the cypher.

So why would they put all that time and money into forming a group of experts to compile these lists if they are not considered even somewhat telling? And why would FBI Agents searching through emails in other pedo cases using these lists to help identify the crime being committed and the likelihood of which illicit industry it is taking place in?

I think it becomes really difficult to argue that these emails do not show that something is off.

I will also say (with love and respect btw) that the fact you said all the emails seem to be talking about normal pizza-related activity makes me think you might not have read any of the emails :/

"Then there is the baby with money in it's mouth. Let's not pretend we all haven't seen photos like the one below and laughed."

I know i saw this picture and thought "how odd":

I mean isn't it odd that Laura Silsby was caught red handed trying to traffick 33 children from haiti...and the clintons along with the clinton foundation got her released? Isn't it odd that both bill and hillary have admitted to going to what has been deemed "pedo island" with their friend (a convicted pedo) Epstein over 20 times (bill) and a handful of times (hillary)?

There is a point when we have to say "this deserves a real investigation". I can't honestly see how anyone would not think we should. (not saying you are against further investigation of course).

P.S. I hope you consider what I am saying. There is a point when everything seems to point in one directly too strongly to ignore.