"The easiest explanation would be there was literally a napkin or handkerchief with a map on it. Maybe this was a map to a pizza restaurant or maybe the handkerchief had a pizza restaurant logo on it. Asking someone if a map on a napkin is theirs doesn't seem very weird to me. The person probably wanted to know who's it was and if they still needed the map."
Oh we can't do occam's razor here...the likelihood that it is a handkerchief with a "pizza related map"...why? Because I can literally (yes literally) go out and show you a number of other quotes that can be added onto this. When it is one quote that makes me wonder...I don't get a big lightbulb going off above my head. But when you have literally a network of people all talking like this...it means something other than what it means on the surface. ----and i mean every time (have you ever spoken in code to others? Didn't it sound odd to others who didn't sit on the inside with you?"
Obviously the FBI disagrees with you that code words should be ignored and should nearly always be taken at face value---even when it seems to be used completely out of place. Instead they compiled entire lists of these words along with the associated meaning within these criminal enterprises to help them identify precisely what kind of criminal activity those in communication are running.
As far as my 10 years in pizza---who do you think has heard every single combination of phrases using the word "pizza" you can ever imagine? Who do you think has heard people talking about ordering pizza in all kinds of slang from various parts of the country? When you work in an industry you learn the "lingo". So it means a HUGE amount that I know the lingo because if it was a normal saying to have found a "pizza-related handkerchief", or "do you think i'd do better playing dominoes on pizza or spaghetti?" ...or (I really don't feel like going and getting more...but they are very easily found) I would be telling you a completely different story. I'd be saying "no this is a common phrase used in the industry...and i can tell you this for certain".
"They also seem to disagree with pizzagaters. I find the invocation of the FBI in pizzagate to be quite selective. When convenient for the narrative they are invoked but then in the next sentence will be thrown under the bus as a corrupt organization that is in on the whole thing."
that is odd considering that i haven't read anything saying this. If you are talking about James Comey...I think you should first consider that he apparently read through 650,000 emails with a small team over the course of ...what...4 days? Impossible...I hope you will recognize this fact.
He also said that Hillary could not "reasonably" be charged for something I guarantee you I would have gone to prison for doing 1/1000th of while in the military.
Secondly, just because 1 person (james comey) comes out to say "nothing to see here" means very little. He does not represent the totality of the FBI--he is simply a figurehead. When I put down the FBI (which seemed to be an assumption on your part as I had said nothing bad about the FBI until this moment), I only talk about that...because the contents of her emails "did not put our country in danger". It is punishable to have government information held on private (and unsecured) servers. Very very illegal unless it is directly signed off on by higher ups.
When an entire group of experts have to come together (at the behest of specific department heads overseeing certain areas of crime), however, and represent the experts in their field within the FBI, this is an entirely different situation than Comey. So I have to say that it seems a bit selective of you to act as though the FBI is a singular entity and that the actions of a director, or my opinions about him, have anything to do with the FBI's relevance as a whole. ;)
"Obviously the FBI disagrees with you that code words should be ignored"
They also seem to disagree with pizzagaters. I find the invocation of the FBI in pizzagate to be quite selective. When convenient for the narrative they are invoked but then in the next sentence will be thrown under the bus as a corrupt organization that is in on the whole thing.
Considering that portions of the FBI are reportedly full of Trump supporters that absolutely loath the Clintons why aren't they all over this thing? I find the lack of FBI arrests speaks volumes right now.
"They also seem to disagree with pizzagaters. I find the invocation of the FBI in pizzagate to be quite selective. When convenient for the narrative they are invoked but then in the next sentence will be thrown under the bus as a corrupt organization that is in on the whole thing."
I keep reading "seem to" but your entire point of questioning here seems to be based around the idea of having proof. I have seen nothing saying the FBI denies this or the relevance of their Pedo Symbolism in this case.
I am genuinely curious---can you show me a link? Or is this something that you are assuming?