Hello.
But have you also told @tyrannyunmasked that I also proved you wrong on every single one of your points?
Here and here
If you are willing to listen to my proof like I have yours then I'd be happy to break down that video minute by minute because that is basically a longer remix video of the the video you posted the other day.
I couldn't care less if Assange is a zionist or not. All I care about is the truth. Which you guys aren't providing.
@fortified You have been whole heartedly defending WikiLeaks (which is well in your rights)
Others and I have been telling you that the evidence is the lack of leaks on Israel and the fact that Assange supports the 9/11 official story! (for a couple examples)
Like I keep repeating to you, it's fine to disagree (agree to disagree) but you keep asking for proof, like you want Assange to tell you himself?
It is opinion we are talking about and you seem upset that not everyone shares yours?
It's always best to reference original source material.
Yes he says people are "distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11"
He also points out "I believe in facts about conspiracies,"
Wikileaks can only publish what they get given. If he doesn't have the facts about 9/11 he couldn't say in an interview he believed in it. It doesn't mean inside he has an opinion of what could of happened.
I just don't see a strong enough connection between him having an opinion based of what he knew about 9/11 in July 2010 and him being a zionist now.
@fortified Defending Assange for stating "distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11" REALLY? You are reaching so far for your love of Assange that you claim he can't count or thinks 1 + 1 = 3? You see what you want okay? Best of luck to you :)
I bet he thinks Trump is going to make America great again still.
@fortified If you watched my video, towards the end Corbett shows the 5 dancing Israelis stating "our job was only to document it"! Many consider that "proof" not to mention a hell of a lot more (including common sense) but hey enough of getting off topic.
There are many signs/dots that make Assange look like "controlled opposition" but I am done repeating myself and I hope you can relax and have a good night
So now does that make me a zionist?
I'm not defending what he said. I was putting what he said into context.
Anyway even you Mr.lecrazycanuckeh don't have solid proof 9/11 was an inside job.
Are you a zionist for not proving 9/11 was an inside job yet?
If you want answers yourself become a hacker. There is half a million + Anonymous hackers out there looking for proof of 9/11 etc. Don't you think it's more likely that info would come from one of them? Assange is only one man and Wikileaks aren't hackers.
I feel for you man. I want proof of 9/11 as well but until then we can't go around taking our frustrations out on people like Assange.
Plus. I wouldn't care if you were chatting about ufos or 9/11 or chemtrails or flat earth or synthetic worlds or any other conspiracy but what you are chatting about here is dangerous and damaging without proof. Wikileaks is constantly in danger releasing material. Just because some of the material you haven't seen isn't zionist related you think he is a zionist. There is probably 10,000000 files plus on WIkileaks. Go and at least have a search for what you want proof of. I can help you if you want. Are you looking for zionist secret letters or something?
You guys peddling this factually inaccurate/disinfo for views doesn't help.
I don't even know what your opinion relates to. All I have heard is Assange is a zionist.
Here is a little background on Israel so you can at least understand why I'm so confused.
Israel was formed in 1948 by the UN and signed off by President Harry S. Truman THE USA PRESIDENT.
Harry S. Truman also started the CIA.
Wikileaks isn't bringing down the west. The west is bringing down the west. Mossad/CIA/DeepState/MI6. They are all the globalist elite wanting a new world order.
I honestly don't understand where 'Assange is azionist' even comes into it.
I'm going to finish now but I hope you will at least question your sources and not get led down paths by people and videos that have very loose claims and that come across as very bias from the start.
From where I am seeing things it almost seems like the guy in the video is the disinfo guy.
Obviously everyone is aloud an opinion. But opinions can be very dangerous if they are backed up by loose claims and 7 year old quotes taken out of context.
You are a human being with an incredible mind. You can do a near infinite things with it.
Don't suffocate and waste it getting consumed by thoughts that you may never prove. Not everything is a conspiracy theory. You will drive yourself mad.
How on Earth is that out of context? If he is saying it only based on documents he has or not, he is still saying that he is annoyed by the 911 conspiracy. Which has so much evidence to support it was an inside job overseen by Mossad that it's not even funny.
The hour long video is meant to expose Julian Assanges connections with the very criminals he is supposedly shedding light on. No where do I claim to solid have proof he is and agent. The evidence I provide speaks for itself. We can't go on not questioning these figures put out as heroes or we will be lead a stray.
If you can look at the clear connections and still trust Wikileaks than fine, that's your judgement, but don't come to me accusing me of something and negating things in my video as if its disproving anything.
I deal with people like you everyday, I know when you leave things out to control an argument. I'm not here for games, so don't even play that..
You seem to be the one playing games.
A game of view harvesting and ego inflating.
Sure I have left stuff out. It is a very complex situation that would take hours to post. But I will if I have to.
I've put more facts into disproving your point than you included in making the point in the first place.
I'm almost temped to make a post calling you lot out for being conspiracy nuts that are to far down the wrong rabbit hole. But I don't want to bring any more attention to this theory.
I had the title and everything.
See you around