He's right to pull out of it and it backs up his election pledge.
I totally agree that clean technologies should prevail and they will (at the expense of coal etc). However, I'm in the climate change hoax camp and therefore believe that the Paris treaty is a scam to de-industralise the west.
The UN wants to completely redistribute wealth by attacking the most successful countries. How better to do it than to set binding limits on emissions of a natural gas (CO2). There is not an aspect of our lives that doesn't involve the release of CO2! The whole carbon tax thing is stupid and just a way of controlling us all (agenda 21).
Regarding the globalist agenda to attack successful countries -- agreed 200%, if such a thing were possible. I think it's in line with the university administrators attacks on Asian students who score very well on standardized testing ... makes no sense to attack achievement and success, unless it is to promote a nefarious agenda.
I'm on the side of climate change being real, but I'm very open-minded on this issue and would love to be proven wrong. I just look at it from a basic, scientific perspective...no combustion process is "free." As far as I know, matter cannot be created -- only the transfer of one state to another. If so, when we engage in industrial combustion, that "stuff" has to go somewhere. My brain is a little fried right now, but anyways, I respect your argument -- and it's an issue where I see the merits on both sides.
Yes always good to be open minded and adapt one's thoughts when new information comes to light.
This video is a good summary IMO: