It's clear to me now that much of the criticism or aversion to Wilcock, Goode and others who've spoken about such things stems from the fear that critic experiences in just considering what these people are presenting. I've watched these guys with a my own critical eye for a long time now. I've found a few things that have rubbed me the wrong way, however the breadth of Wilcock's knowledge and insights always astounds me. Say what you want, but this is a fully dedicated man in what he's chosen to do. I'm just unable to write off either of these guys at this point. As I said in an earlier reply, Time will tell.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
David is very knowledgeable on stuff dealing with ancient civilizations, symbolism and conspiracy related. And he told in an interview that he consciously chose to become a speaker on those subjects. And very much liked his older presentations but the stuff he got from these supposed deep level inside sources always was way out there and unsubstantiated.
For Corey's stories I need something to back them up. I'm sure he also draws from all the stuff that was already out there. I listen to him, take note of it, but I highly doubt him.
I've watched every episode of his programs on Gaia, and his knowledge and expertise goes way beyond what you mentioned here. Concerning Goode, I would as well like to see something more substantial to back up his claims. However, much of the info has been correlated with statements that others have made.