Not having a firm stance on this, I'd like to just point out that the fact that an idea hasn't been implemented correctly in the past, that doesn't mean it can't be implemented correctly in the present. I'm only making this point so that people consider alternatives and don't succumb to cognitive dissonance when at least entertaining those other options.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
" the fact that an idea hasn't been implemented correctly in the past, that doesn't mean it can't be implemented correctly in the present."
This is technically, true, but it still remains strong evidence against the success of such a thing.