I've talked about this to friends & family. Once the economic situation is plundered to a point where inflation is going to take a toll & regular people are going to be put in a very bad economic situation that could result in a revolution against the state, the powers that shouldn't be would rather thrust the world into war than to have their tax cattle turn on them. Obviously, events like W.W. I & W.W. II are far to complex for such a simple explanation as this, however, I feel that the state trying to hide or find a scapegoat for inflation & a rapidly deteriorating economic situation has played a role in pushing the "governments" of the world into war. Many catalactitions today are saying that the bubble of the US dollar is having a hard time holding together. So, this may be motivating a move to war. The fog of war is used to cover many a crime from the powers that shouldn't be.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
'War is a Racket' by Smedley V. Butler.
But, what is a 'catalactition'?
@corbettreport did a video called "Why are economist always wrong?" Wherein James gives a fantastic breakdown of the foundation that the soft science economics built upon. One reason economist are always wrong is because their whole school of thought is built on the wrong foundation. A catalactition, on the other hand, has a foundation better suited for the kind of information people look to get from an economist. In short, Paul Krugman is an economist & Jeffery Tucker is a catalactition. Mr. Corbett does a much better job laying this out sooooo.... here's the link.
https://steemit.com/economics/@corbettreport/1nyuash5