You have not helped him much with your comment, for all you have done is argue based on emotions and beliefs - without any facts being exchanged. So what if YT did not like him? Did you check the names who were recently banned? Not all were of the RWing.
Has it ever occured to you that people can have some political positions without belonging to some exclusive club.
If your political position supports the exclusive club, then either you do support them (are one of them) or else, you are sucking up to them so as to be accepted as a member of their club.
What I represent is not an American political platform - I'm not even American. But, more and more people are being woken to what is planned for them and because those plans are already in effect and their lives, the lives of their children and heir countries are being destroyed by the pc corporate marxists, they no longer accept arguments which are based on emotion, on pc feelings. They must be based on facts and reality.
I'm one of them. I've seen my country being sold out and destroyed to our worst ever enemies, after freeing ourselves from 400 years of slavery to them.
I gave facts: China is facing huge economic problems because of not being able to steal American wealth - while your friend claimed China is booming and taking over the world economically; Kalergi sold his plan to the socialists and they have faithfully implemented it; Trump has reversed the destruction which even now the socialist marxists, called the Democrat Party are still determined to achieve their sick plans.
Any person who has been an accountant or a businessman, can see through the BS which your friend is trying to sell us. So, yes, my accusations still stand, only now they include you, for neither of you are actually capable of debating your opinions - all you can do is try to use emotions to persuade us.
The only emotions that influence me are those that demand I protect my family, my friends, my country and traditions. You have not and never will appeal to those, for all your arguments, based on a bit of truth, just a bit, but basely misrepresented and out of context so as to give them legitimacy, are fake.
You want to call me names? Sure, go ahead, it is still (mostly) a free world and since calling us Nazis, racists - amusingly even those of us who are black, so your mild attacks will not upset me. Being sworn at and the vilest words any traitors to mankind use against me are accepted as proof that I am doing and saying what needs to be said to expose and stop you.
You clearly said that he was part of an elite. Being part of a group is not the same thing as holding the same political positions of that same group. I am just pointing out that you were fast in making an asumption without any facts to back it up. How is that arguing from emotions? David is not my firend, I actually do not agree with him on several points.
I didn't call you any names. Show me were I did.
On last point and I am done with this, you wrote:
(The highlights are mine)
From what I can gather you view yourself as being on the side of what is true and good and myself as being on the side of evil (whithout actually knowing were I stand). Honestly, I think that is a very dangerous position to hold. History is filled with men that considered themselves righteous but that commited atrocities in the name of good.
The only thing I would ask is to stop to consider for a moment that the person on the other side is also a human being that also holds his/her beliefs in the same manner. Maybe then we could all have a conversation instead of throwing shots at each other.
If you were my neighbour, your argument would carry a lot more weight. For we could sit face to face, drink our coffee and argue our beliefs. Apart from us being fce to face, would be the hints I get about you from how you care for your property, whether you help others in the neighbourhood...plus a dezillion other clues we each spread about ourselves, in real life.
Here, all we have is the picture each of us present - and we should expect to be judged on it without complaint, since we chose how we want to appear.
I did go to your blog page, in the hopes of getting a clearer picture, but it seems you mostly resteem. Those resteems can only give a faint image, it is your own words and aspirations for our world that I would prefer to read.
I have made many posts (apart from my fiction) which shows how I think and what are my hopes and fears. The fears are not for me, since I expect to die soon (I hope, as I do not want to live too far beyond all those I love, who're either already gone or will be doing so soon). However, I do have dreams for a future that sees mankind learning from their past and soaring to new achievements, in practical ways (which includes technology), but more important, in wisdom and ethics.
I do not see any of my dreams reflected in the selfish desire by the globalists to take over the world. I therefore do not only see them as the enemy of mankind, but also mine.
Of course talking face to face would be optimal. I can understand that you have concerns for the future of your loved ones. As for myself I can tell you that I share the same feelings. Maybe we do not see eye to eye or do not identify where the real problems are but we do have something in common. I don't make a habit of antagonizing with others (sometimes I fail) but I try to understand the motivations behind their words and actions.
The only thing I hope for is that humanity can overcome tribalism, superstition and anything else that holds us back. In the meantime and before I die I would like to pass this worldview to my children. That is all I really want.
:)