You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: We Can't Agree On Pizza Toppings But We Can Save The Planet?

in #nature • 7 years ago

Nice article you've got there. However, let's not forget about a couple of things:
"We" can create synergy, whereas "I" can not.
"I" can not propogate the species, whereas "We" certainly can.
"I" am weak and vulnerable, but "We" are stronger.
There is nothing wrong with the idea of co-existence or, even, co-dependency. It's a really good thing my mom and dad were around to teach me how to wipe my butt when I was a kid, otherwise...

7 years ago in #nature by
$0.00
    1 vote
    Reply 5
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     7 years ago  

    "We" can create synergy, whereas "I" can not.

    sure. "some" of us always do. again. we are talking about a global issue here, not a class project.

    "I" can not propogate the species, whereas "We" certainly can.

    oh come on....irrelevant

    "I" am weak and vulnerable, but "We" are stronger.

    against who? other "we's". how's that constructive or even safe? if anything it is more dangerous.

    There is nothing wrong with the idea of co-existence or, even, co-dependency. It's a really good thing my mom and dad were around to teach me how to wipe my butt when I was a kid, otherwise...

    nobody said otherwise.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       7 years ago (edited) 

      How is propagation of the species irrelevant? Talking in a global context, it is absolutely necessary. Furthermore, the last time I checked, the US did not, singlehandedly stop Japan and Germany in WWII. There was a pluralism involved, it was a group effort. "We" certainly accomplished something that an "I" could never have done, alone. This is also why North Korea will fail, as a State, sooner than later.

      [-]
       7 years ago  

      How is propagation of the species irrelevant?

      The fact that it takes 2 people to fuck is irrelevant. We are talking about global content here.

      Talking in a global context, it is absolutely necessary.

      exactly. but it takes only 2 people to agree at a time. hence . IRRELEVANT

      Furthermore, the last time I checked, the US did not, singlehandedly stop Japan and Germany in WWII.

      Why is this relevant? Group effort? Group effort can stop a war or create one. If Germany had won all the glorious stories about stopping the evil US will be the de-facto truth today. You assumption in heroics is irrelevant. Nobody stopped anybody. Some people won and nothing really changed. I wrote an article about this "If Hitler had won"

      There was a pluralism involved, it was a group effort. "We" certainly accomplished something that an "I" could never have done, alone.

      Nop. Pluralism exists in everything. USA did not really agree with England or France. It was a temporary alliance to satisfy mutual interests. I explain that in the article. READ IT.

      This is also why North Korea will fail, as a State, sooner than later.

      This is also why North Korea will fail, as a State, sooner than later.

      Unlikely. There is nothing really holding together a state. Even if it falls under any kind or rule it is still that, a state.

      You are being too patriotic mate. and irrelevant...

      [-]
       7 years ago (edited) 

      I admire your contrarian spirit. It does, however, remind me of why I never had the desire to go past Philosophy 101 and Speech 101 in college: it begins to make EVERYTHING YOU SAY, IRRELEVANT. Good day to you, sir. :-)

      P.S. Please stop losing your friends over a difference of pizza toppings. Everybody already knows that Hawaiian Style is the best of all.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         7 years ago  

        pineapple makes everything better.