Images aren't working on your post OP (at least not for me). Which is a bummer because his sounds like a pretty tantalising mystery. If you can fix I would love to see..
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Images aren't working on your post OP (at least not for me). Which is a bummer because his sounds like a pretty tantalising mystery. If you can fix I would love to see..
Alright buddy, think I have it sorted now...
Pretty interesting stuff, but what do you make of it?
Thanks, thats better.... Nope no idea what to make of it. Was the Baltic ever dry? I mean they're was supposedly a time before the Atlantic sea flooded into the Mediterranean and apparently there appears to be sites of archaeological significance under water off the coast of Egypt etc.. Could the same be so for the Baltic, could that be some sunken building or foundation perhaps?
Interesting stuff, I'm going to do some research and if I turn up anything of interest I'll let you know.
The Baltic sea is relatively new in the grand scheme of things. It was formed the receding Glaciers around 10,000 - 15,000 years ago.
This would not be the first settlement found under the water in this region. I was reading that there have been stoneage settlements found closer to the Swedish coasts which would have been last inhabited around 11,000 years ago.
I used to suspect this theory, but I always found the drag marks in the sand to be out of place and hard to explain.
They may only appear to be drag marks, they may be evidence of slippage (like a landslide) or glacial ice pushing the massive stone bed which is detached from the bedrock over many years. EDIT: + AND many thousands of years ago.
As you say though, it's way out in the deep.