Satoshi Nakamoto's goal was to create a decentralized system. In order to achieve complete decentalization, no figure/person should be on the center of it. If he the inventor and creator introduced himself to the community, whether he likes it or not, he will by default be at the center of it and will become the de facto leader of Bitcoin, gaining himself power and influence which goes against what he wants to create.
My other guess is that, since this is a completely new and pretty much a "controversial" technology with no backing by the government, he probably feared that the the authorities will be after him after some time. To prevent this, he opted to hide himself from the community right from the beginning.
This depends on choice. Going unnoticed as an inventor is something that will keep raising questions. Just like the case of bitcoin inventor, no one know his identity and people keep wondering whom he could be.In fact, some said they are group of people.the fact that has not been ascertained. Aldo the appear and disappearance of Tom Elvis after creating the mimblewimble white paper was surprising.he came with his white paper on a bitcoin research channel without anyone knowing his identity and he refused to talk about this till date. He left it for people decipher.
I'm sure that every anonymous inventors is aware of peoples curiosity over their hidden identity and their silence might in my opinion mean they are happy about the way the world keep talking about their great idea without knowing the brain behind it.
We have lots of inventors that are well known and their inventions still keeps speaking their name.not to go far we have people like Ned Scott the master of steem blockchain, Diego puccy the Utopian master, Jonching the creator of Musing and so on who leave their identity open to the world simply because they want to be noticed..
I believe the anonymous inventors simply want to keep themselves away from the public. They want to impact in silence by contributing to the world's development unnoticed. If there could be any other reason then its best known to the anonymous inventor
This depends on choice. Going unnoticed as an inventor is something that will keep raising questions. Just like the case of bitcoin inventor, no one know his identity and people keep wondering whom he could be.In fact, some said they are group of people.the fact that has not been ascertained.
I'm sure that every anonymous inventors is aware of peoples curiosity over their hidden identity and their silence might in my opinion mean they are happy about the way the world keep talking about their great idea without knowing the brain behind it.
We have lots of inventors that are well known and their inventions still keeps speaking their name.not to go far we have people like Ned Scott the master of steem blockchain, Diego puccy the Utopian master, Jonching the creator of Musing and so on who leave their identity open to the world simply because they want to be noticed..
I believe the anonymous inventors simply want to keep themselves away from the public. They want to impact in silence by contributing to the world's development unnoticed. If there could be any other reason then its best known to the anonymous inventor
Well, it is often a decent precaution once you do not expressly needn't to be. He does not got to expose his temperament for any price sensible, thus, being non-
anonymous would mean solely dangerous things for him - like Special Weapons and Tactics squad breaking into your house as a result of government that freaked out thinks that you just square measure a part of some
revolution current simply because you came up with the concept of recent crypto-anarchism compliant currency.
You know, would he be glorious, he'd most likely be AN idol in minds of the many folks. the kind of idol governments sacrifice once one thing goes wrong. rely
on it. He had the choice of staying anonymous - and used it, and it clad to be nice. that is what we must always do once it's attainable and therefore the opposite has no professionals adequate to overweigh the cons.
I could only guess.
Satoshi Nakamoto's goal was to create a decentralized system. In order to achieve complete decentalization, no figure/person should be on the center of it. If he the inventor and creator introduced himself to the community, whether he likes it or not, he will by default be at the center of it and will become the de facto leader of Bitcoin, gaining himself power and influence which goes against what he wants to create.
My other guess is that, since this is a completely new and pretty much a "controversial" technology with no backing by the government, he probably feared that the the authorities will be after him after some time. To prevent this, he opted to hide himself from the community right from the beginning.
This depends on choice. Going unnoticed as an inventor is something that will keep raising questions. Just like the case of bitcoin inventor, no one know his identity and people keep wondering whom he could be.In fact, some said they are group of people.the fact that has not been ascertained. Aldo the appear and disappearance of Tom Elvis after creating the mimblewimble white paper was surprising.he came with his white paper on a bitcoin research channel without anyone knowing his identity and he refused to talk about this till date. He left it for people decipher.
I'm sure that every anonymous inventors is aware of peoples curiosity over their hidden identity and their silence might in my opinion mean they are happy about the way the world keep talking about their great idea without knowing the brain behind it.
We have lots of inventors that are well known and their inventions still keeps speaking their name.not to go far we have people like Ned Scott the master of steem blockchain, Diego puccy the Utopian master, Jonching the creator of Musing and so on who leave their identity open to the world simply because they want to be noticed..
I believe the anonymous inventors simply want to keep themselves away from the public. They want to impact in silence by contributing to the world's development unnoticed. If there could be any other reason then its best known to the anonymous inventor
This depends on choice. Going unnoticed as an inventor is something that will keep raising questions. Just like the case of bitcoin inventor, no one know his identity and people keep wondering whom he could be.In fact, some said they are group of people.the fact that has not been ascertained.
I'm sure that every anonymous inventors is aware of peoples curiosity over their hidden identity and their silence might in my opinion mean they are happy about the way the world keep talking about their great idea without knowing the brain behind it.
We have lots of inventors that are well known and their inventions still keeps speaking their name.not to go far we have people like Ned Scott the master of steem blockchain, Diego puccy the Utopian master, Jonching the creator of Musing and so on who leave their identity open to the world simply because they want to be noticed..
I believe the anonymous inventors simply want to keep themselves away from the public. They want to impact in silence by contributing to the world's development unnoticed. If there could be any other reason then its best known to the anonymous inventor
Let me talk about satoshi and his anonymity
Well, it is often a decent precaution once you do not expressly needn't to be. He does not got to expose his temperament for any price sensible, thus, being non-
anonymous would mean solely dangerous things for him - like Special Weapons and Tactics squad breaking into your house as a result of government that freaked out thinks that you just square measure a part of some
revolution current simply because you came up with the concept of recent crypto-anarchism compliant currency.
You know, would he be glorious, he'd most likely be AN idol in minds of the many folks. the kind of idol governments sacrifice once one thing goes wrong. rely
on it. He had the choice of staying anonymous - and used it, and it clad to be nice. that is what we must always do once it's attainable and therefore the opposite has no professionals adequate to overweigh the cons.